My last Post (“About Turns”) seems to have sparked a lot of comments. The surprising thing I noted in these comments is that initially there was some apprehension and some disbelief about what I said was likely to happen, but at some stage, justifications for MDP’s actions regarding the elections commission have emerged.
I am sorry that I have not been able to answer some of the issues raised by visitors to the blog. I am currently out of Male’, in an area of the country where the internet is not readily accessible. It is not that I do not want to answer, but I have just not been able to. It is a rather hectic schedule on one of these campaign trips! Having to do it during Ramazan makes it more difficult.
Let me attempt to clarify the issue of the Elections Commission as I see it. I think it is time to call a spade a spade.
The constitution defines the Elections Commission as an Independent institution. It is defined as such because it is supposed to execute the law without fear, favour or prejudice. One essential cornerstone for democracy to prevail is having free and fair elections. This is only possible with the Elections Commission setup as an Independent institution.
The MDP has been a leading voice up until now, criticizing Qayyoom because he was manipulating the elections process. But now it looks like it is alright for Qayyoom to manipulate the process as long as he shares the manipulation with MDP. The bottom line is, MDP has sought to join Qayyoom and the DRP in blocking certain actions of the Elections Commission which may block their candidacies (both Qayyoom’s and Anni’s). This notion is further strengthened by what Legal Reform Minister Nasheed said in Majlis today. He is now claiming that challenging the candidacy of anyone in the Supreme Court is only up to the Elections Commission. Now that DRP and MDP has made the deal to control the Elections Commission, the well disguised Nasheed who love this nation so much, and is so patriotic and apolitical is now starting to prostitute his “profession” by implying that public interest challenging in the Supreme Court may not be possible, and he is seeking to once again close the doors of the Supreme Court to anyone except MDP and DRP on the issue of elections. He thinks he is being very crafty, and that he is closing all doors to challenge election processes and outcomes via a piece of legislation. But I assure you, he still has me to deal with.
Those who argue that it is alright for MDP to engage in this treacherous behaviour argue that my proposal was worse because it gave 2 seats to the JP. This is a mistake. If you looked at all three proposals which were put forward, you will see that it is only my proposal which had any logical basis. My proposal allowed the nominees from all five parties fielding presidential candidates a seat on the EC. A sure fire check and balance within the commission itself.
What is most worrying for me is the fact that Anni and MDP have finally publicly acknowledged that they will:
Manipulate institutions to pull decisions in their favour,
Try to fool the public to justify their actions,
Attempt to twist and turn laws and their interpretations to gain and propagate power.
In a nutshell, are not these the very things that we have criticized Qayyoom for, and that we are fighting against? MDP fans, do you now see why I had to leave the MDP and why I can’t become the running mate of Anni?
The other day, Mariya said in the Majlis that Fuad Thowfeeq was not representing MDP. Two days later Afeef is saying in a Press Conference that Fuad represents MDP. Now they are trying to create an innuendo that I was behind whatever leaflets are floating around. The Plot thickens! I will tell you this. If and when I want to say something to the public, I will do so quite openly. On my own, or the Liberal Party’s, letterhead. Not on MDP’s letterhead. I have nothing to fear, and nothing to lose. Even on this very issue, I was the first person to predict MDP’s actions, on my personal blog. So why should I float cowardly pamphlets on the streets in the dead of the night?
Let us acknowledge a few facts. Anyone who seeks to gain favourable decisions from an “Independent” Commission by placing his or her own people within it, and by making deals with the devil to achieve it can never even think democracy. History is rife with people who have seemingly carried the public torch, projected themselves as “people’s heroes” and then went on to become absolute dictators. They do it by creating undying loyalty until they control public institutions and then they become institutions by themselves.
Power games. The blood of Evan Naseem had still not dried from the killers’ hands when Afeef, Mariya, Ibu, Shihab and other “reformists” voted Qayyoom into another term of office. History doesn’t lie.
Chairman Mao, Adolf Hitler, Stalin, Jamal Abdul Nasir, Saddam Hussain, Muammar Qadhafi. There is no denying history.
Saabahey.... You are our Mandela.
ReplyDeleteIbra,
ReplyDeleteMay be I am too dumb to understand this. Please help me. You say "The constitution defines the Elections Commission as an Independent institution" but it still asks Political parties to nominate memebers for the Elections Commission? So when you say independent, what exactly do you mean? Independent from what? Everyone other than Political Parties?
I dont see any problem with this. Long time back, even you have said that you will do whatever you can, by every mean possible (as long as its legal) to change Gayooms government. MDP is doing the same thing too? JP is doing the same work. Ofcourse you guys have different parties because you have your differences on how to do this. Whats the big deal!! You guys should stop blaming each other. Focus on your goal.
ReplyDeletethe ideal situation is when these commisions are headed by indepandant individuals not belonging to any party.
ReplyDeleteyou have to give credit to maumoon for always stating that anni is after power and doing something for the public is secondery.
cant some one cut k. nasheed to size.
ps: based on the same logic i would also like to point out that the judicial service commision is also not an independant commision.
Ibra. Lets get the facts together.
ReplyDelete1. Your proposal for elections commission gave 2 seats to JP. counting Ali Faiz proposed by IDP. this is not favourable to MDP. you yourself have spoken out against the threat of plutocracy several times. i see gasim's cronies as evil as gayoom. so MDP has done the best for them. they secured two seats and sacrificed three seats.
2. Nobody has accused you of distributing the leaflets. What Afeef said was that two former presidents of MDP had access to the letterhead, as well as the former cabinet secretary. I have heard people say that it was a plot by Munavvar's people. I have never heard anybody say Ibra did it. Looks like you are trying to find an excuse to start attacking MDP.
3. We all know why you can't be a running mate of Anni. It is because of your ego.
4. Did you go to Malaysia and meet with a Commonwealth assigned mediator to start a dialog with DRP, when you were MDP President? Weren't you willing to negotiate then?
5. When you were chairing the drafting committee why didn't you propose a better arrangement than giving all seats of elections commission to political parties?
When all reformists have to unite against Gasim and Gayoom, you are trying to find out excuses to attack MDP. This is different from positive and genuine criticism of MDP policies.
Let the records show that we have been stating from the very beginning that MDP is none other than Sikka & his goon squad dressed as Reformists; yesterdays guerrilla scum-bags in todays Armani suits..
ReplyDeleteThey have made an unholy alliance with shady foreign business interests and questionable charitable foundations, and with hired politicians such as Mariya Didi ( the lame duck voice-box of MDP) they seek to fool the common man into replacing one dictator in his marble palace with these bunch of thugs.
MDPs supporters need to come to terms with and deal with the autocratic and unilateral tactics of Anni, if they do not wish to see history repeat itself for another 3decades..
Wiki-
"The moderates in the party have been quickly sidelined as soon as their purpose, as the common man from the streets image, expired.
The most prominent of these moderates is Ibrahim Ismail (Ibra) who was elected as the President of the Party by popular mandate. His resignation, it is claimed by many is the strongest sign that the Party is just a public show and that the real power brokers are operating from the shadows."
Let the records show...
my vote for ibra is confirmed...
ReplyDeleteDear Ibra,
ReplyDeleteFYI I dont belong to any political party.
"IF" Gayoom can come up with his promised bridge project, and find a foreign investor who is willing to invest and recover/profit from the it in the long run (by tolls). Would you still oppose it? I really didnt understand it when you said that its not worth to spend this much money for Male-Hulhumale residents. You are talking about a third of the population! Why are you so negative on this?
Dear Ibra,
ReplyDeleteIt is high time that people (especially the grasroot members of MDP) are made AWARE of all this. As I mentioned to you sometime before, awareness of the people is the key for true and meaningful reform. A structure can be put in via the constitution, institutitons built, but a meaningful change does not come about just by this. Already we are seeing this. The EC is nothing but independent, the judicial service commision is not independent, the supreme court yet to be formed is on the verge of being 'taken over'...The future looks dull and gloomy...
Today I'm very disappointed with MDP. All my hopes for a better Maldives through MDP have shattered! What MDP did with the election commission is totally unacceptable and I dont buy the justications made by the MDP MPs at the news conference, as I staunchly want the election commission say no to Maumoon's candidancy. Although MDP claims a victory, how can I accept it when they have chosen a DRP loyal among themselves for the election commissioner?! If MDP won a victory why could not the commission agree to elect MDP loyal for the position of Elections Commissioner? There is no way I would vote for Anni now.
ReplyDeleteIbra, I am astounded by you. When people are under pressure, or insecure, their true selves emerge. I truly wonder how you yourself would have voted after the Evan Naseem incident. I wish those MPs had the courage to vote against Gayoom them, but I also think it was another time, place and country. I do not believe in you any longer, I do not believe in your sincerity to the cause enough to think that you would have done any differently.
ReplyDeleteThe fact of the matter is that negotiations are a part of the reform process, they come about as a result of the present government weakening and being forced to liberalise following mass demonstrations or civil disobedience.
You did not have the man power in Majlis. As an experienced poltician, who constantly espouses the importance of legal negotiations and pacts, you of all people should understand that in these circumstances, in this transitional period, the Majlis is key for forming institutions, and if you dont have the votes then you're a done man.
Fuad Thaufeeg is not an MDP man, I also dont believe that your proposal for the commission would have been any more independent, in fact there have often been rumours of you yourself recieving money from Gasim. It is probably true. Gasim has probably had a hand in every political party, nonetheless he had to create his own one, as he couldnt persuade the rest to follow his own line.
2 of Gasim's men or 2 of Maumoon's. Between the devil and the deep blue sea isnt it? You also probably know what would have happened if the commission had been more favourable towards Gasim. They would have taken up Munawar's claim of Anni's candidacy being in question, and taken the matter to court. No doubt it would be alot easier for you and the rest of the candidates if Maumoon and Anni are out of the picture. I wonder where your conscience would be that day. In support of your 'friend', Anni, or would that be a day, where he has to turn around and say, Et tu Brutes?
As you have so elegantly made us all aware how the "new" constitution values the independence of the Elections Commission as a cornerstone of its democratic aspirations, I am confused as to what the point of this rant is, when democratic politics is defined as a PROCESS by which society regulates the allocation and acquisition of power, power benefitial to a majority.
ReplyDeleteSince you lay a huge claim of ownership to the "new Constitution" it is not clear to me whether you're criticizing the process that you have given way to,or just angry .
Do you mean to "sarcastically" "accuse" "Nasheed who love this nation so much, and is so patriotic and apolitical is now starting to prostitute his “profession”".....
and claim that your list was submitted in purely in the interest of the public and not at all gaining or acquiring political platform for SLP and your candidacy?
It appears to me that you are the one reducing this to personal attacks.
Manipulation, subversion, coercion, agreement, disagreement, agreement to disagree, gentleman's handshakes .... you claim to be a politician naive to any of these concepts inherent to the western political system that you claim to have fought so hard for in the parliament.
I think you are a skilled manipulator, a good subversive, etc . and youre still at it.
You may just be a little insecure that Golha, Anni, Nasheed, maybe a little more skilled at it than you...
Or are you just too much of a righteous hero?
Difference in perceptions and what's the fuss. Did you not stop street demonstrations when you were the MDP President, against the opinions of many MDP activists?
ReplyDeleteI may be wrong here, but the point it perceptions differ.
Politics is dirty everywhere. And repeatedly we have been shown by the likes of Gayoom, Qasim Ibrahim, Munnavar, Anni, Umar Naseer and even our erstwhile religious scholars that they will manipulate, twist and turn their words and deeds in a manner befitting them when they need to do so.
ReplyDeleteIbra, you have stood true to your word and delivered your promises to us. With no offense to the others who did their part, there is naught but you in the Parliament who has so tirelessly fought to change the system in a manner that is civilized and rational.
I salute you!
= S.F =
Independent from domination IT NEEDS TO BE. It doesn't seem very logical, to have been given seats at the EC to a particular alliance (which would be that of the MDP and DRP) when all five parties are competing against each other - especially when they all seem to contradict themselves. If a particular party has the power to dominate the EC, then leaving the people to cast the vote doesn't make ANY sense at all. If you've got that kind of power.......you may as well claim your rule over the nation. Well............the two is different in a way. And that, i believe is what the people don't get. Claiming rule over the government in that way would certainly cause the country to fall into crisis. Why you ask? It's because the people will obviously know that the particular person has illegally claimed power over the country. So the two parties can't do that because it is all too exposed to the public. That's obvious......but think about what they're doing dominating the elections committee for themselves.........what difference does it make? You see, total domination of the EC especially in an alliance where there's a party which already has the people supporting them, would give them the upper hand. And yes that IS INDIRECTLY CLAIMING POWER OVER THE GOVERNMENT. its's sort of like.....a small scale but, more effective way. It's effective because people wouldn't really know the procedural actions of the two parties when they're actually doing it under the cover of "sharing power". So what happens here is........The two parties accommodate the EC seats for themselves...........the people cast their votes..............either Anni or Maumoon gets elected..................Anni would only make it if Maumoon doesn't cut him loose halfway through the elections when Maumoon is all ready to tackle the remaining opponents.
ReplyDeleteI don't hold anything personal between the two, and certainly i wouldn't dislike either one, should they be elected. But that WILL change if either party wins the elections with their advantage over their dominance of the EC.
Anyhow, it should be noted that these statements, in no way show actual statistical results that can be proven.
It is not necessarily the number of seats in the EC that decide whether or not you'll get elected. It can be changed (100% sure). What I want you to know is that, it is their plan to gain power by taking over the EC and that it is wrong!
Welldone Ibra.I salute you for having the guts to say what you have said. Anni has been creating his own army of thugs to shut down any opposition to him or to halt him being exposed. Once again you have come out withh the peoples voice just like you did with the "minivan bahus" when all the power hungry wannabe presidents were hiding behind the UN veil. Allah be praised for giving the guts to you to come out to the public and disclose all the evil be it Qayyoom, Yaameen, Anni or Gasim. You definitely have won my vote.
ReplyDelete“A political leader must keep looking over his shoulder all the time to see if the boys are still there. If they aren't still there, he's no longer a political leader"
ReplyDelete"MDP" trip to north it proves that the Maldivians are no longer willing to buy crap. Also i would like to highlight the point BURUMA's pay checks still finds its way to MDP, noone can deny this even Anni couldn't give a positive comment on the issue at the last SIYAASATH program of TVM. MDP vs DRUG ABUSE, MDP vs TERRORISM, MDP vs CORRUPTION, these are "RAHMEDHU BODU SIRRU" lets say a prayer with the blessing of Ramazan, truth bears only seeds of victory.
dear anonymous (trying to put facts together)
ReplyDelete1. Willing to negotiate and starting a dialog is a lot different from taking over (or trying to do so) of a an institution supposed to be independent
2. When you say "When all reformists have to unite against Gasim and Gayoom" - what's happening is the other way around -UNITING WITH QAYYOOM.
3. Is it a coincidence that terrorism charges against Anni was dropped the very next day EC vote was taken
Be a man ... accept the facts ... it is clear as daylight
the first thing next parliment should do is making EC and JSC fully indepandant institutions.
ReplyDeletethis blog is attracting a lot comments. i beleive your writings are very convincing for your supporters. other the other hand your writing is creating more anger towards you from all other oppersition supporters. so its like 1 againts 5 others fighting in here.
ReplyDeleteanother important point to note is that your writings are not easy to digest. I beleive in your writings but most cant digest the real truth when u critise openly to others.
maybe this might not be a good polictal move. but i am sure its just the truth & most of us dont want to beleive it.
I think we all know its not the terrorism charge thats the problem that Munawar and the rest were bringing up. It was the supposed 'theft' from when Anni was a MP. Dear reader, would it be better if the terrorism charge hadnt been brought back? With Anni not being a candidate for the election, what good does it do for you?
ReplyDeleteahmed, i don't think you are dumb. you may be unaware. being independent does not mean not allowing the political parties to have any say in whatever goes on. The EC does not ask for party representation. It asks for parties to nominate independent individuals - i.e. individuals not member to a political party. This creates an accountability knowing that 1. they are independent and 2. all parties contributed to its formation.
ReplyDeleteThe sad part being the neither DRP nor MDP have allowed for equal contribution. I had this belief for a long time that MDP in the least would stand by the rights of people, political parties alike. Well, I guess the true colours are coming about.
I hope you understood the independence and role of political parties in the formation of the EC.
Anonymous (on bridge):
ReplyDeletePlease don't get me wrong. I am not against such a bridge. If our resources allow for it, we should do it ASAP.
But when you are trying to view things from the perspective of the President, one has to consider the opportunity cost of such huge projects to other areas in the country. It's a question of putting cost against benefit against opportunity.
Just for arguments sake, consider this question. "Would it be better to divert this 150 million dollars to a place like Laamu Gamu and build the necessary infrastruture to house, say, 50,000 people and hence divert people from Male' so that 120,000 people are not congested into 2.5 sq. km?" Or, "after building the bridge, who is going to use it?" as there is still no avaenue for people to finance housing. Many such considerations are necessary before such decisions are made.
Anonymous (the astounded one):
ReplyDeleteShort answer is, whether it is myself or Anni or Qayyoom, the decision of an independent commission, which is working to enforce the law without fear, favour or prejudice should be binding on us, and can only be challenged in a court of law.
If the application of these processes eliminate one or the other, then tough cheese.
By the way, if you look back into the records of the Special Majlis, you will find that I was the only one who opposed this stupid "theft" clause which is threatening Anni's candidacy. None of the staunch MDP MPs stood with me then. That was the time when this issue should have been tackled. I tried because I knew it was targetted at Anni, and it would ultimately compromise him.
The DRP played it, and Anni IS compromised now.
What you are essentially saying is that Anni deserves to be a candidate, and therefore we should manipulate institutions to ensure that he is, even if it means obstructing due process. I agree that Anni deserves to be a candidate, and I don't believe that there is anything in the constitution which bars him from doing it, but I don't agree that institutions should be manipulated to achieve these objectives.
Anonymous (with the 5 points):
ReplyDeleteNo, I did not look for a deal in Malaysia. I simply went on an Eid vacation with my family, and I called on Musa Hitam to pay my respects. This was the first rumour that Anni started to undermine me after I became President of MDP.
Yes I was always in favour of negotiation. I still am. But not tearing down the institutional frameworks of an infant democracy. Please don't equate negotiation with selling your soul.
Please check the drafting committee minutes to see what my proposal was regarding the EC. The current proposal was one by Afeef, Mariya and Ibu at the negotiating table. Even then I did point out the folly of the wording which allowed "mushrooming" of Parties to secure EC seats. All of this is on public record.
Please check your facts before making wild accusations
Anonymous (the confused one):
ReplyDeleteI don't agree with your definition of democracy. So there is no point in arguing against what stems from that and follows henceforth.
Regarding my proposal for EC, you couldn't be further away from the truth. You have to understand that this EC for the interim period was designed to have "multi party" representation so that each would create a check on the other. It was never the intention to allow any one party to have more than one representative, directly or through proxy.
This does not necessarily have anything to do with my candidacy or the Liberal Party. I would have cried foul even if the Liberal Party had been placed instead of IDP. That is why I didn't propose a combination of 2DRP - 2MDP - Liberal Party.
Further folly is, in an attempt to oust Qasim, what MDP has really done is put themselves at the mercy of Qasim on any issue where MDP and DRP disagrees. Qasim will now be the final arbiter of disputes. The implication is that the MDP cannot afford to disagree with the DRP on an election issue now.
Both MDP and DRP have played into the hands of Qasim and Yameen.
Try to digest this one.
Anni seems to be master of the realpolitiks. He has defeated you, Munawwar and many nay sayers. I don't support him but he is proving to be a smart manipulator.
ReplyDeleteYou are ofcourse a respected parliamentarian- no doubts about that. But from what you have written, one can only decipher your political naivety.
What cannot be denied is that MDP has really made a clever break through by voting with DRP.
You still seem to believe in the power of 'due process' but what you should understand is that even that wonderful 'due process' happens within the real of politics.
I have made up my mind that you are an excellent law maker but not a politician.
May be you are too good to be in the fray.
Do please take this as a compliment.
- an observer -
http://siyaaseefathifuh.blogspot.com
ReplyDeleteyou may reply to this one..
Mr Ibra, would there be a more inquiry-based way to approach you? because what we could post here on the blog would somehow need to correspond to the article being discussed, and that would leave out any opportunity for us to interact with you in a more willing direction. I am hoping for a public-made discussion board, perhaps a forum where we could raise our own questions and concerns. That is ONLY if you have the time.....I hope I'm not asking too big of you.
ReplyDeleteAnd....also, have you considered giving a heartfelt speech to the people of the Maldives like senator Mccain did? That could give the people hope! And all the more reason to support you............
Dear Ibra,
ReplyDeleteThe Elections Commision has DRP nominated 2 members, MDP nominated 2 members and 1 from Jumhooree Party too. I dont understand who is controlling the Elections Commission. As far as I understand nobody has control of the Elections Commission. Why am I wrong?
Ibra just cant fathom the fact that he lost it. His vision is so narrow minded he cant seem to look at the bigger picture.
ReplyDeleteDear Anonymous who wrote on September 9, 2008 7:50:00 PM MVT :
ReplyDeleteI am really grateful that Ibra is not seeing the bigger picture Anni is seeing - which has been changing with every breath he take.
1. First Maumoon (or from his words the famous Golhaa) was THE ONLY obstacle to reform and only his removal can see even the start of reform process
2. Second was his negotiations with Yameen to take over the reigns from Maumoon (from the frying pan into the fire) to lead inthiqaalee marhalaa
3. Then came the part against Khassa Majlis - his fantasy to recreate the UTHURU GADUBADU two years back on November 10th
4. The latest is as of today Maumoon is not a problem - when he was asked about who should be responsible for the human rights violations of the past he answer was "CIRCUMSTANCE"
What a joke??? I do pray to Allah that not to give the "vision" Anni is having to see the "bigger picture".
Dear narrow minded.
ReplyDeleteAnni is so right again in saying the word "circumstances". shows how clever and visionary anni really is.
Anni works for the people while most of you work for your own good. period.
Dear Anonymous,
ReplyDeleteOfcourse i agree with you
But the difference is that it is not the "VISION" we want (a one that is somewhat blurred and never clear)
dear narrow minded,
ReplyDeleteU havent looked hard enough. If u did , ull see the clarity.
Ibra,
ReplyDeleteI notice you are one person who believes elections must not be held by 10th October. It needs more time. But as this is a constitutional requirement, and as the constitution clearly says that there cannot be any amendments until presidential/parliamentary elections have been held, how do you delay the elections?
hi anonymous,
ReplyDeletelooking hard to see the clarity you mentioned can only b achieved when u have good shot after your afternoon nap and you are half stoned.
that is not most of us wants.
ciao.
Most of u want is MONEy. nothing else. i get it and many get it.
ReplyDelete