Food For Thought

Facing reality.......

A coup d’état is usually brought about by people who are convinced that they cannot acquire power through democratic means and / or those whose vital interests are mightily threatened without power .

Monday, June 15, 2009

Development or Rule of Law?

“Nobody can rule against LAW, so just by saying rule of law means that you have nothing else to offer” (edu)

Ever since I entered the front line of reform and politics in the Maldives, I have been talking about the necessity of practicing the rule of law. I talked about it in the first “Minivan Bahus” way back in 2004 (it seems like centuries ago now!) and I spoke about it extensively in the last Presidential Elections. I visited every single populated island north of Male’, and some in the south as well, and spoke about it in every single one of those islands.

I have been criticized for getting “too hung up” on this issue. I have been ridiculed for preaching the rule of law “too much”. I have been accused of being an idiot because “the highest priority in the Maldives right now is Development” and I am not talking about that. The last comment on my last Post (Post Election) says it clearly, and that has prompted me to write this Post. I decided to dedicate a separate Post in reply to that comment because I believe that it warrants serious consideration.

In various discussions I had with different people and in debates in Parliament when I was there, and increasingly the stated rhetoric of the current government makes it clear that for some people, there is a certain dichotomy in the two, i.e Rule of Law vis-à-vis Development. Some see the two as two very separate and parallel concepts, while others view one as the anti-thesis of the other. I tend to view the two with a lot of overlap, if not almost synonymous. I certainly believe that Development cannot be achieved without the Rule of Law.

Most of those who believe in this dichotomy do so without analyzing the inextricable links between the two. They see the Rule of Law, or rather should I say the Law itself, in its entirety, as dealing with crime, human rights, social regulation and elections. Of course, if this narrow view of the Law and its application held water, then their view is correct. But unfortunately it doesn’t.

I could expound on the virtues of the Law and the Rule of Law at length, but not here. Let me focus instead, on my main argument, the Rule of Law – Development nexus.

Development is dependent on the growth of commerce and productivity. Commerce and productivity is dependent on willing labour and capital investment. Investors do not invest in environments where there is no certainty of protection for their investments. There are two ways to protect investments. One is to get the protection of powerful individuals and the other is to get the protection of the law. Labour is only willing in an environment where their rights are protected and there is certainty about award wages and remuneration. This can only be guaranteed either through the protection accorded by powerful individuals or through the protection by the law.

If the investors and the labour both seek protection from the same powerful individual, what happens when there is a conflict between the investor and the labour? Would investors want to risk millions of dollars of their money, depending on the good will of an individual?

The solution to these problems lie in the second alternative : both parties should seek the protection of the law. The Rule of Law must prevail for industry to thrive. Industry does not thrive except in a competitive free market. Competitors do not have the room to play in the absence of the rule of law, because if two competitors depended on two powerful individuals for protection, there will not be room for two. The more powerful of the two powerful individuals will eventually triumph and only one will survive.

When I say the Rule of Law here, I am talking about basic things such as : equal opportunity for all, the certainty that certain things will happen in certain ways and that goals can’t be shifted after the ball is struck , that there will be justice delivered without fear or favour in the case of disputes.

Just a week ago, I spoke to a friend of mine from overseas. She spoke about the opportunities for investment in the Maldives, but she was hesitant to engage in investment because she was not convinced that there was a sound enough legal framework and a good enough justice system for her to take that risk. One of the first things that serious investors do when planning an investment is to look at the provisions in the law, and the application of it in the courts. I am certain that if the legal framework in this country is strengthened, and institutions dealing with upholding the law are also strengthened, this will boost the confidence of potential investors…..and ultimately lead to development.

What are the prospects in this regard? Hard to say. I hope the new Majlis, and the Courts with newly gained independence will work towards guaranteeing this important framework. However, the key players in the game are consumed with power consolidation and power grabbing contributing towards deteriorating the strength of the law. I was apalled just last night, at a forum I attended, to hear prominent lawyers, the government spokesman and MPs urging the Prosecutor General to disregard the law for political expediency, of course, in the name of Maslaha. An indication of what is to come?

Following the law is not an easy thing. It does impede the speed of some activities. It even can have unfair consequences at times. But follow it we must. If a particular law is having undesirable consequences through its application, then we must change the law quickly. But until it is changed, it must be followed to the letter, because if not, the whole legal system can be made a mockery at the whim and fancy of various individuals for various purposes. That is why we wrote into the Constitution, in black and white, requirements for the President, the Attorney General, Judges and Independent Commissions to the follow the Constitution and the Law only, at all times.

Therefore, I believe that a system where the Law rules supreme is a pre-condition for proper development, with equitable outcomes, to take place.

My obsession with the Rule of Law stems from my desire for Development and Justice for the people of my country.

7 comments:

  1. thats exactly what the people dont understant and thats exactly why votes can be sold and bougght and thats exaclty why more emphaisis is given to the person than his policies and thats exactly why some rich entire families dominate maldivian parliment. the poeple dont understand what the parliment is all about and role of parlimentarians. people dont understnad that the first thing an investor checks before investing is, corruption effectives of setling disputes- briefly the strtengh of judicla systems in protecting the contract and awarding damages. without this we are in the dumps. i have suggestion. we need an ngo to educate voters on those issues and from what i see you and k. nasheed is the ideal people for the job. actually its poeple like you we want in the parliment.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Your overseas friend is quite right. Doing business here is like playing Russian roulette. Only with 4 bullets instead of one.

    I understand what you mean when you say the Law must be respected; that is a vital keystone for the foundation of a working society. However, the law here is taken as something else. Like you said "the law" is often disregarded in the name of "communal peace."

    Here's wishing you luck if you're going to attempt it. Heck, knowing you, you'd probably try even if everyone and their grandfathers said it wouldn't work.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The general thrust of the historical struggle for the rule of law (Locke) in England was against the absolute tyranny of the King and his people. One of the essential components of the idea was that nobody can be above the law, and in this lies the security Ibra's friend seeks. In the Maldives, personal power has often overridden rule of law both in the Majlis and in the affairs of all, simply based on custom, convention, the divine right of the Be'Fulhen to rule which was carried over into the Maumoon regime. Of course, passion, desire for vengeance oftem means that the rule of law is overridden based on Maslahah (Maslahah - from Islah in Arabic) means for the people, for the good of the people or 'utility' and is a theme which was commonly used by the Islamic jurist Imam Al-Shaafi which was the style of Islam introduced into the Maldives and into south East Asia. The general theme in England was that codified law must reflect natural law, and by natural law what was implied was the protection of life, liberty and property. Noone in power should be able to threaten life liberty and property except if someone robs another of their liberties, thereby forsaking their place in the state of nature and relegating themselves to the state of war.

    However, by extension of the principle of liberty which came about much later through left wing or workers liberals(social-liberalism I am referring to here not Communists who go too far left that they violate the right to property and other dignities) labour rights and minimum wages are also to be protected against powerful people. However, as I said, the idea is, all are beneath the law, so noone can change your security so long as it is enshrined in the law.

    And of course, by further extension of this, the rights to property must also be protected against what JS Mill calls the tyranny of the majority.

    The Maldives is a place where one can just suddenly lose their businesses due to some political reason, i.e. the rulers are above the law, so, to encourage investors, what Ibra is fighting for is that all are beneath the law, he is fighting for the supremacy of the rule of law above all else, and this is indeed a very noble struggle which one who has studied dhivehi history will appreciate the significance of custom (which is reinterpreted by whoever has been on the throne) verses codification which is eternal...

    This is actually something which is deeply rooted in Islamic history as well,. Imam Ahmed Ibn Hanbal was executed by Calip Mamun of the Abbasid Dynasty (I am not using the name to be funny or sarcastic as ludicrous as it seems that was actually his name ironically enough _ message from above for Ibra hehe) for fighting for the uncreated nature of the Kalam (the Word) the eternal... The issue at stake was the misuse of certain Koranic texts, or their complete dismissal to justify corruption and theft of certain peoples property in some cases. The idea that the Rule of Law (Muslims believe the LAW is derived from the Koran)was above even the Sultan was a very motivating factor in the struggle for social justice (Adhaalath) in early Islamic history.

    So Ibra's insistence must be understood to be a deeply Muslim struggle, and not just some Western idea designed to override Dhivehi custom and culture.

    I support this Ibra though many may not appreciate the depth of importance of what you are saying.

    Abdul-Rahman

    ReplyDelete
  4. Good point, both abdul-rahman and ibra. But the problem is the maldives constitution is not based on the concept of liberty. It limits liberty to the 'tenets' of islam, which makes it subjected to the whims of sheiks and liberal scholars.

    Not sure whether such a constitution can be brought about in this democratic process. Democracy is actually quite opposite to the concept of liberty.

    Ibra, do you think it would be possible to have a constitution based on liberty and freedom (like say eg US constitution), which empowers the people and limits the powers of the state?

    ReplyDelete
  5. that is why i have tried to introduce the idea that the rule of law is compatible with shariah law...

    ReplyDelete
  6. I mean, that rule of law is compatible with the the tenets of Islam. The approach I have to this is a very non-fundamentalist approach, in the sense that I feel the Hadith's and Quran must be understood in a context where the reason behind a ruling is eternal but not the external application. The law must go way beyond the religion but the religion provides a kind of an underlying form of unity and one of the aims of the law should be that it does not violate the principles of Islam. As vague as astatement as this is, even Western constitutions, which the foundation of the rule of law rests upon, have reference to God so even liberal constitutions have a very deep religious foundation if we understand liberalism in its original context.

    What are these principles? They could be, the unity, harmony, sovereignty and well being of all Maldivians being that all should strive to treat each other as brothers and sisters in the faith. Ummah, community is derived from Um, means Mother, the Maldivian Ummah should be a safe, secure environment like a Mother. Also, Islamic is the 'Iqhwa' the brother and sister hood, or, the Iqwan, the brothers... So, these principles are a good starting place, but the foundation of human dignity should be that Allah loves his creation and is offended when that creation is unjustly hurt... Islamic priniples can be defined by a constitution but in the end, the interpretation or application of these principles should be only one small area of specialisation of constitutional interpretation. The idea that a religious scholar can make rulings for all types of cases, murder, land theft, constitutional interpretation, marriage, is absurd sorry to say... Maldivian judges need more than just a religious degree, most have but some don't...

    Abdul-Rahman

    ReplyDelete
  7. Ibra...I know Law and development go hand in hand...
    i mean Rule of Law is an Obligation rather than a promise
    its very good a President will rule by law, if he doesnt, he ll be impeached. A Presidential candidate is expected make statements for the people of maldives, most of whom are not very intelligent.
    I thought some people took your "rule of law" as if thats a "promise" that only you will provide as a luxury to maldivians, rather than the "obligation" to provide it.
    I know many presidents can "bend" the law and may be you are saying you will never try to "bend" the law...
    Well my view of you is you will not bend the law...and you would have gotten many more votes, if not for a female running mate, which again is allowed in the LAw, but not in the customs of the local people...its sometimes LAW vs Customs...Not everything permitted in the law has to be practised!!!

    ReplyDelete